Reviewed By noele p (Pensacola, FL) Reviewed for a 2007 Honda CR-V —4/29/2014 8:14 PM
Better than stock I got average of 23-25 mpg depending on air conditioner use. This is all city driving stop and go.
Reviewed By Carlos L (Miami, FL) Reviewed for a 2004 Honda CR-V —1/27/2012 10:12 AM
i've a customer from K&N SINCE 2002, in all my cars and suv, and definetly is a undeniable choice when you compare with the stock original filter, better gas mileage slighty (1/2" mile to 1 mile) but instead of that the main reason is, not to buy again the restricte stock filter, second, better CFM , which mean better air flow, so your engine breath better, and optimize the air fuel ratio. is good to mention that always clean your MAF SENSOR, and disconnect the negative pole of the car battery , push the brake pedal to discharge the energy of the ECU, of the vehicle, to re-learn the new CFM values, and optimize the vehicle, and more evident if you decide to upgrade to cold intake air.