Reviewed By Peter P (RENTON, WA) Reviewed for a 1967 Mercury Cougar —10/11/2017 3:26 PM
Seems to really keep the rain off my car in the pacific Northwest. Fits very tight
Reviewed By John W (Sacramento, CA) Reviewed for a 1967 Mercury Cougar —1/11/2014 7:26 AM
I'm very happy with this cover. I've used the same style on several other cars and this one fits and functions just as well. The only thing I'd improve is the placement and size of the rooftop antenna hole. (If the opening at the base was slightly larger, it would be easier to get it over the antenna when the cover is cold.)
Reviewed By Christopher B (Bellevue, WA) Reviewed for a 1967 Mercury Cougar —1/22/2012 12:39 PM
I own several of these covers for some of my classic cars that are kept garaged (i.e., as dust covers). They work very well for that purpose. However, there are three things that annoy me: 1. No mirror pockets. 2. No antenna cutout. They give you a kit for making your own antenna hole, but I have had difficulty with making the hole in the right place and getting their grommets to come together. 3. Overall the fit on the car is fine, EXCEPT for the rear end. There is a bunch of excess material in the middle of the rear end that looks lke - you guessed it - a saggy diaper. I have two of these covers and have no undertanding of why there is this extra material that hangs down in the middle about a foot. Since all other contours for the rear end are accurate, I have no idea why this is there. It really looks stupid. There you have it. I knew about these three issues from my first purchase, and still bought it again. So, in my mind it is a very good car cover, and I can live with these annoying, but functionally irrelevant flaws.