Ships Between 12/18 - 12/20
- What Do You Drive?
- Style:Conical filter
- Part #:11-10004
We’re sorry. The information you have requested is temporarily unavailable.
aFe Pro-Dry S Air Filters Part #11-10004 Customer Reviews
7 Customer Reviews
Reviewed by David G (POINT ROBERTS, WA) Reviewed for a 2009 Ford F-450/550 — Jan 08, 2015 4:20 PM
We have a 2009 Ford-based E450 motorhome. Using Ford's standard air filter we got an average of a low of 7 MPG & high of around 8 MPG, not towing a vehicle behind. Using your aFe Pro-Dry reusable filter we're getting between 8 and 8.9 MPG, & this is with towing a Hyundai on a dolly! This is an improvement of around 15% improvement in gas comsumption. With thanks, David G
Reviewed by mark i (RICHARDSON, TX) — Mar 13, 2014 8:14 PM
Reviewed by Ryan Z (CYPRESS, CA) Reviewed for a 2000 Ford Crown Victoria — Aug 19, 2013 1:30 PM
I needed an air filter, but instead of wasting $25 on a disposable filter, I decided to save money and get a reusable one. After searching around I found this one, liked what it had to offer along with the price, and decided to buy it for my '05 F-150 4.6L V8. It has incresed my mpg slighty, only about .2-.3mpg, but that's all city driving in crowded Socal. Won't give you massive gains, but it is just a filter not an intake. As always satisfied with Autoanything's prices and customer service.
Reviewed by Henry T (Colorado Springs, CO) Reviewed for a 2002 Ford F-250 — Feb 15, 2010 8:51 PM
I purchased another filter thinking it was a performance filter, and was disappointed. When I found your AFE filter, I was excited about what to expect. Right away I noticed the exhaust was louder and more throaty. I have not had time to check milage yet, but it seems more powerful and responsive. I look forward to hooking it to my 26' trailer and watch it perform! All this and I never have to buy another filter as long as I own my truck! Received it sooner than expected too.
Reviewed by Dannie T (Effingham, SC) Reviewed for a 2007 Ford F-150 — Aug 21, 2009 6:23 PM
Reviewed by daniel h (Opp, AL) — Apr 13, 2009 11:00 PM
Purchased this over a K&N because there was no need to oil. I have had issues with oiling and MAF equiped cars in the past and decided to go with the synthetic this time. So far so good, It was a drop in so really no noticable gain but good sound and I did pick up 2 mpg and my 03 F 150 5.4. I will be replacing my wifes K&N in her Pathfinder as soon as it needs to be cleaned\oiled.